FALL 2019

use the links below to navigate to a specific project

Project 1| Site Systems and Patterns

Project 2| Phenomenon Engagement

Project 3| Human Engagement

Project 4| Participatory Social Space

 

Reflection

The primary phenomenon that I studied this semester was wind, whose primary causalities included built structures; natural barriers such as trees, bushes, grass, etc.; regional climate changes; as well as greater climatic variances in North America. I focused on the interactions between wind and other systems at the base of Pete’s Hill for projects 1-3. For project 4, I switched locations to Bogart Park. I employed a variety of tools to record the patterns on my site, including photographing areas of significance, string and ink, site mapping, online information and research, in-person visual observations over time, and data revealed through my intervener. Through my observations, I have learned that literally every system plays an important role in the overall composition of a site, and there is a plethora of systems to consider. In order to create meaningful and successful designs, I synthesized the information I already knew, hypothesized the potential outcomes of a given iteration, and created designs that revealed new information and insights. After this thorough site analysis, I concluded that my transection area off ered a great opportunity to facilitate social interaction because of its optimal situation within the greater context of Bozeman, as well as the climate that has been established by the built and natural structures on site. Throughout the semester, I collaborated with others by giving and receiving feedback while working on projects in the studio, as well as during pin-ups and critiques in class. I learned the importance of system interactions, as well as began developing a mindset geared towards creativity and design thinking. It is important to learn systems thinking because no design is ever created in a vacuum. One cannot hope to create a successful design without fi rst having a thorough understanding of the context the design will operate within. I will carry what I have learned this semester with me throughout the rest of my education and career because what I have learned this semester are the foundations of all design.

Project 1 — Site Systems and Patterns

 

For our first project, we were tasked with analyzing a transect of downtown Bozeman and mapping the site with creative physical photo manipulation. This was a collaborative project; I worked with Erica O’Borsky for the entirety of project 1.

Iteration 1

 
P1.mapping site with photos.JPG
 

This is my initial site mapping of a portion of my transect found at the base of Pete’s Hill.

Iteration 2

 
P1.first iteration.jpeg
 

After our initial site mapping, we decided we wanted to map and analyze the textures, colors, and social hierarchies within our site. We physically manipulated the photos to reflect the qualities of these systemic properties.

Iteration 3

 
P1.second+iteration.jpg
 

Final Iteration

P1.final+iteration_full+view.jpg
P1.final iteration_close up.jpg

In our final iteration, we chose to continue mapping and analyzing the same properties, but we tried to make our mapping more clean and legible.

 
 

Project 2

For Project Two, I switched tack and decided to focus on the primary phenomenon of wind, analyzing the directionality and velocity patterns on my site.

 

Project 2.1 — Wind Mapping

P2.twelve pages of ink mapping in negative.jpg

I chose to physically map the wind patterns on my site by using ink, a string, and paper. From the patterns made by the ink on the paper, I could analyze velocity and direction.

 
 

Project 2.2 — Wind Mapping Drawing

For this project, we were tasked with abstracting our mappings to create a drawing through which we could develop our hand drawing skills.

Iteration 1

 
P2.iteration 1 of pattern drawing.jpg
 

Final Iteration

 
P2.final+iteration+of+pattern+drawing.jpg
 
 
 

Project 2.3 — Engager

 
P2.final intervener full photo.jpg
 

My engager was essentially a modified wind vane that further revealed and amplified the components of directionality and velocity. I used this tool to begin mapping the wind patterns in my transect site.

 
 

Project 2.4 — Section Drawings

drawings of the engager created in project 2.3

P2.small drawing of rotation with wind.jpg
 
P2.small+sketch+ideas.jpg
P2.final intervener section drawing.jpg
 
 

Final Drawing

 
p2.final drawing.jpg
 
 
 

Project 3 — One Person Engager

The objective of this assignment was to create an engager that would allow a person to participate in the system we were studying.

Iterations

I experimented with many different designs, trying to find a way to engage the wind system in my transection area.

P3.idea 1.jpg
P3.idea 4.jpg
P3.idea 2.jpg
P3.idea 5.jpg
P3.idea 3.jpg
P3.idea 6.jpg
 

Final Iteration

For my final iteration, I designed a one-person intervention apparatus which amplified the tactile sensation of wind by creating a structure that would alter the wind’s velocity. Additionally, it amplified the auditory component of wind through a manipulation of materiality and spatial confinement. It was also in this project that I learned about modeling sites topographically as well as taking into consideration how topography is yet another system that holds influence over the grander interactions of a given site.

P3.final-moneyshot.jpg
P3.final-half top view.jpg
P3.final-entrance view.jpg
P3.final-topview.jpg
 
 

Project 4 — Participatory Social Space

In Project Four, I switched my transection area to Transect #10 and focused on the area of Bogart Park. I also switched the typological perspective from which I analyzed wind patterns. The ten person intervener apparatus which I designed for this project viewed wind from a seasonal and temperature-sensitive point of view. In this project I really pushed myself to utilize materials and structural forms that I had not previously employed.

P4.full site.jpg